Write in a way that is interesting to you. Write in a way that you think would be interesting to your readers
When military historians study battles or campaigns, what purpose does it serve? To immerse oneself deeply in the period and master the details, or to connect events of the past to the present? These and other questions are addressed in this conversation between two renowned military historians–Robert Citino of the World War II Museum and Michael Neiberg of the U.S. Army War College. They also address questions of what constitutes good historical writing and why it is especially important to develop such writing skills today.
Rob Citino is a senior historian at the National World War II Museum. Michael Neiberg is the Chair of War Studies at the U.S. Army War College. The views expressed in this presentation are those of the speakers and do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S. Army War College, U.S. Army, or Department of Defense.
Photo Credit: Tom Galvin, using copies available in the U.S. Army War College Library
Other releases in the “On Writing” series:
- GENERAL HISTORY: H.R. McMASTER (ON WRITING)
- WHEN A GENERAL WRITES FOR THE GENERALIST (ON WRITING)
- THE VALUE OF WRITTEN THOUGHT: STEPHEN VOGEL (ON WRITING)
- TWO AUTHORS UNDER THE SAME ROOF
- THE MORE BEAUTIFUL QUESTION: ALEXANDRA RICHIE (ON WRITING)
- FACT AND FICTION: THE RECOUNTING OF WWII WITH JAMES HOLLAND (ON WRITING)
- THE U.S. ARMY IN THE 20TH CENTURY: AN INTERVIEW WITH BRIAN LINN (ON WRITING)
- LIBERATION FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF THE LIBERATED (ON WRITING)
- PARIS 1919: A CONVERSATION WITH MARGARET MACMILLAN (ON WRITING)
- THE CHALLENGES OF WRITING BIOGRAPHIES (ON WRITING)